Gonzaga, G. C hot irsk brud., Haselton, Yards. G., Smurda, J., Davies, M. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Progression and you will People Choices, 29(2), 119–126.
Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. Yards. (2000). The spot from attachment in peoples mating. Review of General Mindset, 4(2), 186–204.
Kraut, Roentgen., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, Good. (2002). Internet sites paradox revisited. Diary away from Personal Situations, 58(1), 49–74.
Kraut, Roentgen., Patterson, Yards., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Web sites paradox: A social technical one reduces personal involvement and you may emotional well-becoming? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.
Kreider, R.Yards., & Areas, J. M. (2001). Number, time, and you will duration of marriages and divorces. Current Populace Reports, 70-80, (Washington, DC: U.S. Census Agency, 2005).
Lemieux, Roentgen., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional studies out-of closeness, appeal, and you can commitment: Testing new assumptions of the triangular theory off like. Emotional Reports, 90(step 3,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.ninety.3.1009-1014
Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, Elizabeth. (2004). Impact most readily useful regarding starting bad: Societal reviews within this close matchmaking. Journal from Identification and Public Mindset, 87(1), 80–95.
Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. An excellent., & Gailliot, Yards. T. (2009). Intrasexual vigilance: Brand new implicit cognition regarding intimate competition. Record away from Identification and Personal Therapy, 97(1), 74–87.
A. (2001)mitment and you can relationships repair elements
Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. An effective., & Gonzaga, Grams. C. (2008). Automatic inattention so you can glamorous alternatives: The fresh advanced psychology regarding dating fix. Progression and you may Human Choices, 29(5), 343–349.
pold, B. E. (1981). Sequential analysis out of disagreement and you may agreement inside the distressed and you may nondistressed marital partners. Log off Asking and Logical Psychology, 49(4), 554–567.
McKenna, K. Y. A., Green, An effective. S., Gleason, M. J. (2002). Relationship development on the web: What’s the big destination? Record off Social Situations, 58(1), 9–30.
The great benefits of confident illusions: Idealization and framework of fulfillment during the intimate relationships
Neff, L. An excellent., & Karney, B. R. (2002). Self-review aim into the intimate relationship: A model of all over the world improvement and you can particular verification. When you look at the P. Noller & J. An effective. Feeney (Eds.), Knowledge ents regarding examination of pair correspondence (pp. 32–58). Ny, NY: Cambridge College Force.
Obegi, J. H. (2008). The development of the customer-counselor thread through the contact lens out of attachment theory. Psychotherapy: Idea, Search, Habit, Studies, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330
Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). The latest social keeping track of system: Enhanced susceptibility so you can social signs given that a transformative response to public exemption. When you look at the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The social outcast: Ostracism, public different, rejection, and you can intimidation (pp. 213–226). New york, NY: Therapy Press.
Pierce, T., & Lydon, J. Age. (2001). Around the world and you can specific relational models from the exposure to personal interactions. Diary from Identity and Societal Psychology, 80(4), 613–631.
Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. An excellent., Tran, S., ). Accessory and you will guidance looking to from inside the personal dating. Identity and Societal Therapy Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.
Ross, L. Roentgen., & Spinner, B. (2001). Standard and certain attachment representations for the adulthood: Could there be a romance?. Log Out-of Public And personal Dating, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001
Rusbult, C. Elizabeth., Olsen, Letter., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. When you look at the J. Harvey & A. Wenzel (Eds.), Personal intimate relationships: Repairs and you will enhancement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schul, Y., & Vinokur, An effective. D. (2000). Projection yourself impact among partners as the a function of the resemblance in their common event. Identity And you may Societal Psychology Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008
Seligman, C., Fazio, Roentgen. H., & Zanna, Meters. P. (1980). Outcomes of salience away from extrinsic benefits for the liking and you can loving. Journal regarding Personality and you will Public Therapy, 38(3), 453–460.